Art4agriculture Young Farming Champions are promoting agriculture as a dynamic, innovative, rewarding and vibrant industry and sparking the next generations’ interest in an agricultural career.
Yet the retention rate in university agriculture based courses is far from ideal. Where are we going wrong? How do we fix this?
Today’s post by guest blogger Art4agriculture’s communication manager Victoria Taylor who blogs at http://flourishfiles.typepad.com/flourishfiles/ reflects on this serious problem for future food security and our investment in young people
10 January 2012
AgSci and the Shrinking Workforce – by Victoria Taylor
This morning, @OzPIEF tweeted a statistic from the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations stating that employment in Agriculture declined by 94,400 (24.9%) over the 10 years to November 2011.
This caused me to reflect on two other Twitter posts that caught my attention recently.
The first was an article from the Central Western Daily, posted by @SammileeTTT where Charles Sturt University’s new head of agriculture, Professor John Mawson said:
“The proportion of university-trained employees in the industry is not as high as it should be. We desperately need to attract more students into agricultural careers.”
That’s nothing new to those of us who work in or with agricultural industries and the statistics back him up. In 2005 the Productivity Commission in their research paper “Trends in Australian Agriculture” found that the proportion of people working in agriculture with a degree was around 7% whereas 22% of the community as a whole had a degree.
The other tweet was by @KondininGroup which referred to Victorian Farmers Federation concerns that the higher education base funding review has recommended raising the fees for agricultural courses at university by up to 25%.
It seems incongruous that these two pronouncements can co-exist. How can the answer to low enrolments in Agricultural Science (AgSci) be to increase fees?
But it made me think about what may be contributing to a low take up of AgSci degrees. I don’t think fees tell the whole story.
Why are some Agricultural Science degrees still four years long?
Agricultural Science is a complex and technical subject area but computer science, accounting, journalism and even many straight Science degrees are only three years. I don’t think it could be said that those students spending an extra year in Agricultural Science are rewarded financially for their efforts on graduation.
Why are so many Agricultural Science degrees inflexible?
I accept that AgSci provides graduates with a comprehensive understanding across a range of disciplines. I am continually reminded that a solid grounding in basic science is transferable across a number industries, which serves graduates and agriculture well. I wonder though, if a student is ultimately interested in animal nutrition, why do some degrees insist they study agronomy for three years before they can specialise?
What is the link between AgSci and Farming?
An AgSci degree doesn’t teach you how to farm, it teaches the science that underpins agricultural production. So an industry leader told me recently when discussing this issue. Some students are therefore disillusioned when they get to university and find the degree is focussed on science, not farming.
Why can’t we retain students in Agricultural Science courses?
I guess some of the above points may contribute to low retention rates. One farmer told me of the 100+ students in their first year only 4 graduated. Where did all those young people go? Well, some transferred to straight Science where they had more freedom to pursue their interests, some went home to the farm questioning the degree’s relevance to their family’s operations and some had just changed their minds about what they wanted to do…which is the right of all young people of course!
I’d like to add a lack of clarity about career paths to the list.
Many of you can think of at least a dozen people in highly diverse careers in agriculture – agronomists, bankers, PR people, scientists, advisers, lobbyists, farmers, machinery dealers, policy makers…etc
If a student decides at the end of first year that they don’t want to be an agronomist or farmer anymore, how do we let them know there are a number of other career options open to AgSci graduates?
Apart from encounters with family and friends, how often do we take the time to engage with young people to demonstrate how rewarding and diverse a career in agriculture can be?
We owe it to ourselves, to protect the investment we’ve made in our businesses and industries and to secure the future of food and fibre production, to support and invest in our young people.
A new group of school-leavers are about to start their AgSci degrees…what will YOU do to keep them there?
Great read Victoria and thanks for looking at my tweet 🙂 It looks like the start of a great blog!
I am going into a Bachelor of Agricultural Business Management at Charles Sturt University, which is a 3 year course, so the change in fees would affect us too.
As you can see from this link from Charles Sturt University (it is based on 2011) fees – that agriculture is already in the 2nd band for fees.
http://www.csu.edu.au/courses/fees-and-costs/2011-tuition-fees/commonwealth-supported-places
To put 25% on top of that seems incredulous and would put agriculture students up there with law and medicine! (I might add CSU is one of the least expensive universities which is fortunate for rural students like myself).
Nurses and teachers are national priorities and rightly so, but if there is the ag shortage there is, I cannot understand the reasoning for raising fees! Surely there should be a push for encouraging students into the profession not discouraging them?
I think we have to do a bit of the groundwork at school. At our school in a rural area there were only three of us studying Agriculture! Overall this year I think there was approximately 1200 or so in all of NSW studying agriculture (I would have to check my HSC paperwork to confirm the exact figure). That is not a lot of youth in the overall scheme of things that are doing agriculture to begin with, and that figure would lesson off with actually furthering that interest at University (just my thoughts).
I really look forward to getting to University and discovering the different options out there. I am not one hundred percent sure which direction I will head in within the industry yet, but I hope I get to see a broad range to finally make my decision.
With education by agvocates such as yourself and Danica, you are helping people realise that we are not limited and other options are out there in the industry, if we find we are starting to falter.
Kind regards,
Samantha